The Corliss Group: 10 satt att minska din sarbarhet pa skattemassiga identitetsstold
Identitetssold fortsatter att vara en av de stora vaxande brotten i USA idag, och lagger en stor borda pa offer, foretag, ideella organisationer och offentliga institutioner, sarskilt när ansokan skattedeklarationer till Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Skattemassiga identitetsstöld hander nar nagon använder din stulna personnummer for att deklarera hävdar en bedraglig aterbetalning.
Vanligtvis, använder en identitet tjuv din SSN for att fil falska tillbaka tidigt pa aret. Du kan vara omedvetna du ar ett offer tills du prova fil din skatt och lara sig en redan har lamnats in med din SSN.
Identitetsstöld ar en topprioritering for IRS. De har redan tagit aggressiva atgarder for att skydda skattebetalarna och hjalpa offren, med mer an tusentals anstallda tilldelade till identitetsstold med situationer. De tranar ocksa anstallda att erkanna atervandande bedrageri och hjalpa offren nar det hande.
Pa grund av detta, IRS $14,6 miljoner misstankta avkastning och hindras skyddade mer an 50 miljarder dollar i falska aterbetalning från 2011 till November 2013.
Du kan inte hindra skattemassiga identitetsstold eftersom vi ar alla utsatta, men här är några satt pa hur man kan minska dina chanser att bli ett offer.
We know there are problems in the financial system, but not how bad they are
Financial Blog Corliss Group
Two unconnected statements from authorities in the US and Britain in the past 24 hours should cause concern for those who worry that the global banking system has become more dangerous in the six years since the crisis, not less.
On Wednesday, the US Federal Reserve published its annual bank capital plan review that saw the North American businesses of Citigroup, HSBC, RBS and Santander all rejected for what it said were “qualitative concerns”.
This morning, the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) released a statement from its latest meeting in which it warned obtusely that “changes to the structure and functioning of markets as banks adapted business models to the aftermath of the financial crisis” meant it had become more difficult to assess the impact of “unexpected developments from any source”.
What the Fed and the Bank both appear to be saying is that big banks remain too complex and that changes made to financial and bank regulation since the crash in 2008 have resulted in the job of assessing systemic risk becoming much harder.
Left unspoken to a large extent in both statements was the spectre of growing financial risks in emerging markets.
